Online Simulation

And More

  1. biomarker discovery
  2. cancer care engineering
  3. cceHUB
  4. colorectal cancer
  5. global proteomics
  6. health services research
  7. lipidomics
  8. mass spectrometry
  9. metabolomics
  10. OMIC analysis
  11. peptide synthesis
  12. population-based models
  13. proteome discovery pipeline
  14. proteomics
  15. sample acquisition
  16. screening
  17. statistical models
  18. visual analytics

Other

Support

Trouble Report

For immediate assistance browse through our support center. You can find answers to many questions in just a few minutes.

If still experiencing problems, send us a report.

required
Why the math question?

Normalization of Aligned LC-MS Data

Posted 12 Jan, 2009 in Tools

Launch Tool

Available Versions

Supporting Documents

This tool is closed source.

Version 3.0 - published on 05 May. 2010
Contributor(s) Ann Christine Catlin
Rosen Center for Advanced Computing

George Howlett
Purdue University
At a glance Normalization attempts to quantitatively filter overall peak intensity variations due to experiment errors such as systematic variable injection volumes loaded onto LC-MS.
Screenshots
  • Screenshot #1
  • Screenshot #2
  • Screenshot #3
  • Screenshot #4
Description

For multi-experiment analysis, aligned data must be normalizalized for sample comparison. Normalization attempts to filter overall peak intensity variations resulting from experimental errors. Several normalization methods have been proposed. One approach is to choose one dataset as a reference and normalize all others relative to this reference. The intensity ratio of each aligned peak pair in reference and sample is calculated. The normalization constant for the sample being considered is then taken as the median of the ratio of intensities for all components between the sample in question and the reference sample.

In the second approach, data is normalized by dividing the intensity of each m/z value by the average intensity of the entire spectrum. In the third approach, the log linear model method assumes multiplicative variation. The maximum likelihood and maximum estimates for the parameters characterizing the variation are derived to compute scaling factors for normalization. This tool implements all three algorithms.

credits

The normalization software was developed by Xiang Zhang, Jiri Adamec, et al. in 2005.

The Purdue Discovery Pipeline was created by the Bindley Biosciences Center under the direction of Charles Buck.

The integration of Purdue Discovery Pipeline models as cceHUB tools and the contribution of test datasets to the cceHUB respository are part of a collaborative effort with Jiri Adamec, Amber Jannasch and Catherine P. Riley of the Bindley Biosciences Center and George Howlett of the Rosen Center for Advanced Computing.
references

Wang W., Zhou H., Lin H., Roy S., Shaler T.A., Hill L.R., Norton S., Kumar P., Anderle M., Becker C.H: Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Anal Chem 2003, 75(18):4818-4826.

Zhu W., Wang X., Ma Y., Rao M., Glimm J., Lovach J.S.: Detection of cancer-specific markers amid massive mass spectral data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100(25):14666-14671.

Hartemink A.J., Jaakola T.S., Young R.A.: Maximum likelihood estimation of optimal scaling factors for expression array normalization. Proceedings of SPIE:4266

Cite this work

If you reference this work in a publication, please cite as follows:

  • Ann Christine Catlin; George Howlett (2009), "Normalization of Aligned LC-MS Data," http://ccehub.org/resources/normal.

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags
  1. OMIC analysis
  2. proteome discovery pipeline